APPROACH / METHODOLOGY

Urban Stitching: An Integrated Approach to Resilient Development

We call it Urban Stitching—an integrated methodology that weaves together multiple disciplines, scales, and timelines to create contextual, resilient urban solutions. Like stitching fabric, our approach connects elements that might otherwise remain fragmented: community needs and technical solutions, emergency response and long-term development, local knowledge and international best practices, green infrastructure and social infrastructure.

Urban Stitching recognizes that sustainable urban development cannot be achieved through isolated interventions. It requires understanding and addressing interconnected systems—physical, social, economic, environmental—and engaging the people who will ultimately maintain and benefit from the solutions we help create.

We believe in participatory processes and strong place-making engaging end-users and clients from early stages of the process to provide continuous feedback and review sessions, and respond to local needs and aspirations.

We know that creating a strong positive impact in communities, our clients and cities can reap the maximum return.

Our services are flexible and can be tailored to your needs. We work as prime consultants leading multidisciplinary teams, as specialized partners contributing expertise to larger projects, or as capacity builders providing training and technical assistance.

Whether you need support with a single phase of work or comprehensive engagement from strategy through implementation, urbanSEED brings deep expertise, collaborative approach, and commitment to sustainable, community-centered solutions.

LET'S WORK TOGETHER

DOWNLOAD OUR BROCHURE

Multi-Scalar + Multi-Hazard approach

FROM BUILDING TO REGION

Our work addresses multiple scales simultaneously, recognizing that interventions at one scale affect and are affected by dynamics at other scales.

Effective solutions must be coherent across these scales, addressing immediate needs while contributing to larger urban systems and regional resilience.

CLIMATE RESILIENCE + MULTI-HAZARD APPROACH

Every project integrates climate and disaster risk assessment, considering both current conditions and future scenarios. Our multi-hazard approach recognizes that communities often face multiple overlapping risks—floods, earthquakes, landslides, cyclones, drought, sea-level rise—requiring integrated solutions.

Bridging Reconstruction + Long-term Development

Our experience spans the full timeline of urban development, allowing us to bridge humanitarian assistance and long-term sustainable development:

Recovery & Reconstruction (Months-Years): Building back better, addressing root vulnerabilities, whole settlements approach

Development & Upgrading (Years): Long-term improvement, informal settlement integration, incremental development

Resilience & Adaptation (Ongoing): Proactive climate adaptation, disaster risk reduction, sustainable maintenance

This temporal breadth ensures crisis response contributes to sustainable resilience rather than reproducing vulnerabilities, and that long-term planning considerations can be taken into account at the reconstruction and potentially emergency phase."

Multi-Disciplinary Integration

Sustainable solutions require integrating technical and social dimensions. Our teams always include both domains:

Hard Components:

Infrastructure systems and networks
Nature-based solutions and green infrastructure
Multi-hazard risk assessment
Physical design and spatial planning
Sustainable materials and construction systems

Soft Components:

Community organization and mobilization
Local governance structures
Capacity building and training
Economic empowerment strategies
Cultural appropriateness and social cohesion

This integration ensures solutions are not only structurally sound and environmentally responsive but also culturally appropriate, economically viable, socially empowering, and institutionally sustainable."

Participatory & Collaborative Processes

Participation isn't just consultation—it's co-creation. We design engagement processes that allow communities to genuinely shape solutions while contributing local knowledge, identifying priorities, and building ownership.

INCLUSIVE PARTICIPATION

Our participatory approach explicitly addresses equity, ensuring meaningful engagement across gender, age, ability, socio-economic status, and tenure security. We design processes recognizing that power imbalances must be actively addressed to achieve genuine participation, and that those who live in a place hold crucial knowledge that outside experts cannot possess.

Our Methods:

Stakeholder mapping and multilevel engagement (community to government)
Focus groups and workshops designed for inclusive participation
Community mapping and participatory data collection
Co-design sessions, tactical urbanism, and co-construction
Game-based pedagogical workshops for capacity building
Multiple engagement formats to reach different groups (not just evening meetings or written materials)

We've developed flexible methodologies that work across literacy levels, languages, and cultural contexts—from informal settlements in Kinshasa to government ministries in island nations. The goal is ensuring that typically marginalized voices—women, youth, elderly, people with disabilities, informal residents—have genuine influence in shaping outcomes.

Systems-Based Thinking

Urban challenges are interconnected. Flood risk relates to land use, infrastructure, ecosystem health, and governance. Housing insecurity connects to transportation, economic opportunity, and land tenure. Climate resilience requires addressing vulnerability across multiple systems simultaneously.

Our systems approach:

Maps interconnections between physical, social, economic, and environmental factors
Identifies leverage points where interventions create multiplier effects
Treats infrastructure as networks rather than isolated assets
Uses historical landscape analysis to understand how places evolved
Integrates multi-hazard risk assessment across multiple threats

NBS AS SYSTEMS INFRASTRUCTURE

We place landscape and ecology at the center of this systems approach. Nature-based solutions (NbS) exemplify systems thinking: green infrastructure addresses water management, public space, climate adaptation, biodiversity, and economic productivity simultaneously—working with natural systems rather than against them. Through historical landscape analysis, we understand how settlements evolved and how natural processes inform resilient design.

NbS simultaneously address multiple challenges: managing stormwater while creating public space, cooling urban heat islands while sequestering carbon, supporting biodiversity while enabling urban agriculture. For example, green infrastructure for flood management simultaneously creates gathering spaces, reduces heat, and provides economic opportunities. From rain gardens in dense settlements to restored riparian corridors, we seek solutions that work with natural systems, recognizing that the most resilient interventions often mimic or enhance natural processes.

Local Appropriateness & Sustainability

Sustainable solutions must be appropriate to context—not just climate and geography, but culture, economy, governance, skills, and local knowledge. We prioritize:

Locally sourced or accessible materials that support local economies
Existing skillsets and construction methods (while innovating)
Vernacular and indigenous practices as starting points for design
Passive design strategies for energy efficiency and comfort
Low-cost, low-maintenance solutions that communities can sustain
Integration with local governance structures and social capital
Economic viability and local economic development opportunities
Consideration of informal practices and existing coping mechanisms

This grounding in place ensures solutions can be maintained, operated, replicated, and adapted by communities themselves—the only true measure of sustainability. We believe the best innovations often come from understanding and enhancing what already exists rather than imposing external models.